<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First thoughts on using var in C# 3.0 with Resharper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/08/15/first-thoughts-on-using-var-in-c-30-with-resharper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/08/15/first-thoughts-on-using-var-in-c-30-with-resharper/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/08/15/first-thoughts-on-using-var-in-c-30-with-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=124#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I too disabled that option in Resharper. I have found that using &quot;var&quot; causes many discussions, some quite heated. I personally think that &quot;var&quot; has its place, but not at the sacrifice of readability and common sense (http://www.timjroberts.com/index.php?entry=entry080724-140907).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too disabled that option in Resharper. I have found that using "var" causes many discussions, some quite heated. I personally think that "var" has its place, but not at the sacrifice of readability and common sense (<a href="http://www.timjroberts.com/index.php?entry=entry080724-140907)." rel="nofollow">http://www.timjroberts.com/index.php?entry=entry080724-140907).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
