<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code for positive data values not negative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/12/11/code-for-positive-data-values-not-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/12/11/code-for-positive-data-values-not-negative/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coding: Keep method/variable names positive at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/12/11/code-for-positive-data-values-not-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-18486</link>
		<dc:creator>Coding: Keep method/variable names positive at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=724#comment-18486</guid>
		<description>[...] refactored the code to refer to what we know is valid rather than looking at the reverse which I think is much more difficult to reason about. public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refactored the code to refer to what we know is valid rather than looking at the reverse which I think is much more difficult to reason about. public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Martins</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/12/11/code-for-positive-data-values-not-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Martins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=724#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Impressive, today I spoke to Cammy about this coding aiming positive results, after reading Pat&#039;s post. What a coincidence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive, today I spoke to Cammy about this coding aiming positive results, after reading Pat&#8217;s post. What a coincidence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/12/11/code-for-positive-data-values-not-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=724#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>I think you mean to throw an exception if someValue == 0 in the first example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean to throw an exception if someValue == 0 in the first example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

