<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASP.NET MVC: Driving partials by convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eymbnfdb</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-82575</link>
		<dc:creator>Eymbnfdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=963#comment-82575</guid>
		<description>this is be cool 8) &lt;a href=&quot;http://xredtube.multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Redtube&lt;/a&gt;  lvhke &lt;a href=&quot;http://maxporn.multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maxporn&lt;/a&gt;  7449 &lt;a href=&quot;http://xnxxx.multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Xnxx&lt;/a&gt;  2800 &lt;a href=&quot;http://xyouporn.multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Youporn&lt;/a&gt;  tdfb &lt;a href=&quot;http://xvideosx.multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Xvideos&lt;/a&gt;  xxts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is be cool <img src='http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> <a href="http://xredtube.multiply.com" rel="nofollow">Redtube<br />
</a>  lvhke <a href="http://maxporn.multiply.com" rel="nofollow">Maxporn</a>  7449 <a href="http://xnxxx.multiply.com" rel="nofollow">Xnxx<br />
</a>  2800 <a href="http://xyouporn.multiply.com" rel="nofollow">Youporn<br />
</a>  tdfb <a href="http://xvideosx.multiply.com" rel="nofollow">Xvideos<br />
</a>  xxts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET MVC: Using Adaptors for partial models at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-11646</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET MVC: Using Adaptors for partial models at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=963#comment-11646</guid>
		<description>[...] of the problems we can encounter when using partials throughout our views is how we should create the model needed for those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the problems we can encounter when using partials throughout our views is how we should create the model needed for those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Teague</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-10578</link>
		<dc:creator>John Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=963#comment-10578</guid>
		<description>Very Cool!!
Have You considered what this would look like using an IOC container? All of the major ones have generic type resolution.  Jeremy Miller has a blog post about how to do it with StructureMap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Cool!!<br />
Have You considered what this would look like using an IOC container? All of the major ones have generic type resolution.  Jeremy Miller has a blog post about how to do it with StructureMap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-10575</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=963#comment-10575</guid>
		<description>[...] to VoteASP.NET MVC: Driving partials by convention (2/20/2009)Friday, February 20, 2009 from Mark NeedhamI like to have conventions in the code I write - I find [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to VoteASP.NET MVC: Driving partials by convention (2/20/2009)Friday, February 20, 2009 from Mark NeedhamI like to have conventions in the code I write &#8211; I find [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasiosyal</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/02/21/aspnet-mvc-driving-partials-by-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasiosyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=963#comment-10555</guid>
		<description>This looks good! I understand that this is proof of concept and I dont want to be the one for premature optimisation - But, I think we can agree that we are better off if we cached all the types descending of ViewPage in a dictionary and then used that to resolve the referencing view rather than load the assembly and iterate through all the types each time. 

Cheers,
Tasos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks good! I understand that this is proof of concept and I dont want to be the one for premature optimisation &#8211; But, I think we can agree that we are better off if we cached all the types descending of ViewPage in a dictionary and then used that to resolve the referencing view rather than load the assembly and iterate through all the types each time. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tasos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

