<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding: Reassessing what the debugger is for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Software Development journey: Year 3-4 at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-23424</link>
		<dc:creator>My Software Development journey: Year 3-4 at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1048#comment-23424</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to make it much more difficult to reason about the state that the code is in and we seem to turn to the debugger way more frequently as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to make it much more difficult to reason about the state that the code is in and we seem to turn to the debugger way more frequently as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Quality Digest - 2009-03-30 &#124; No bug left behind</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-13265</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Quality Digest - 2009-03-30 &#124; No bug left behind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1048#comment-13265</guid>
		<description>[...] Reassessing what the debugger is for - &#8220;Admittedly the name &#8216;debugger&#8217; doesn&#8217;t really help us here as the name describes a tool that &#8220;helps in locating and correcting programming errors&#8221; which is all well and good but I think it should be one of the last tools that we turn to rather than one of the first.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reassessing what the debugger is for &#8211; &#8220;Admittedly the name &#8216;debugger&#8217; doesn&#8217;t really help us here as the name describes a tool that &#8220;helps in locating and correcting programming errors&#8221; which is all well and good but I think it should be one of the last tools that we turn to rather than one of the first.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-12769</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1048#comment-12769</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mark for these correct thoughts! I completely support assertion that any tool should be used with mind. And our brain is a tool that can be better in some cases of modern debuggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mark for these correct thoughts! I completely support assertion that any tool should be used with mind. And our brain is a tool that can be better in some cases of modern debuggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coding: Making the debugger redundant at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-12764</link>
		<dc:creator>Coding: Making the debugger redundant at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1048#comment-12764</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote my dislike of the debugger and related to this, I spent some time last year watching some videos from JAOO 2007 on MSDN&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote my dislike of the debugger and related to this, I spent some time last year watching some videos from JAOO 2007 on MSDN&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetShoutout</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/03/20/coding-reassessing-what-the-debugger-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-12697</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetShoutout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1048#comment-12697</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Coding: Reassessing what the debugger is for - Mark Needham...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coding: Reassessing what the debugger is for &#8211; Mark Needham&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this cool story &#8211; Trackback from DotNetShoutout&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

