<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OO with a bit of functional mixed in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/oo-with-a-bit-of-functional-mixed-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/oo-with-a-bit-of-functional-mixed-in/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Club: Why noone uses functional languages (Philip Wadler) at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/oo-with-a-bit-of-functional-mixed-in/comment-page-1/#comment-19773</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Club: Why noone uses functional languages (Philip Wadler) at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-19773</guid>
		<description>[...] to an extent although perhaps not as much as we might think. I am certainly seeing some benefit in an overall OO approach with some functional concepts mixed in which seems to strike a nice balance between code which is descriptive yet concise in places. I&#039;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to an extent although perhaps not as much as we might think. I am certainly seeing some benefit in an overall OO approach with some functional concepts mixed in which seems to strike a nice balance between code which is descriptive yet concise in places. I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/oo-with-a-bit-of-functional-mixed-in/comment-page-1/#comment-15318</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-15318</guid>
		<description>Sometimes if a solution is particularly algorithmic, you might implement with a static method and a data structure in an oo language. 
Maybe where you see a static there is a potential for a functional replacement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes if a solution is particularly algorithmic, you might implement with a static method and a data structure in an oo language.<br />
Maybe where you see a static there is a potential for a functional replacement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

