<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing unit tests can be fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/writing-unit-tests-can-be-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/writing-unit-tests-can-be-fun/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/writing-unit-tests-can-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-15529</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1167#comment-15529</guid>
		<description>Whether the task is boring or not depends on person exercising it. E.g. exploratory testing is generally considered as boring too and I always enjoyed doing it since it gave me a freedom to move wherever I felt like and it brought some rivalry between tester and developer (which is fun).

I think the same is with unit testing. It is generally considered as rather boring task. As far as you find fun writing them - good for you. It does mean your unit test are most likely great. On the other hand there are many developers out there who treat them as necessary evil and write them only because someone told them to do so. It&#039;s no surprise it bores them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether the task is boring or not depends on person exercising it. E.g. exploratory testing is generally considered as boring too and I always enjoyed doing it since it gave me a freedom to move wherever I felt like and it brought some rivalry between tester and developer (which is fun).</p>
<p>I think the same is with unit testing. It is generally considered as rather boring task. As far as you find fun writing them &#8211; good for you. It does mean your unit test are most likely great. On the other hand there are many developers out there who treat them as necessary evil and write them only because someone told them to do so. It&#8217;s no surprise it bores them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Zilberfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/writing-unit-tests-can-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-15375</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Zilberfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1167#comment-15375</guid>
		<description>Mark, 

Good response. I&#039;ve written one here: http://blog.typemock.com/2009/04/unit-testing-is-boring.html
The comments conversation is interesting. While I agree with what you write, you need to go down the path of unit testing for a while, trying and getting used to TDD or pair programming to understand that. But if you try to explain to people who haven&#039;t tried anything of that - well to them it&#039;s just about writing &quot;additional&quot; code. There&#039;s no convincing argument that doesn&#039;t involve their experience.

At least, I haven&#039;t found one.

Gil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>Good response. I&#8217;ve written one here: <a href="http://blog.typemock.com/2009/04/unit-testing-is-boring.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.typemock.com/2009/04/unit-testing-is-boring.html</a><br />
The comments conversation is interesting. While I agree with what you write, you need to go down the path of unit testing for a while, trying and getting used to TDD or pair programming to understand that. But if you try to explain to people who haven&#8217;t tried anything of that &#8211; well to them it&#8217;s just about writing &#8220;additional&#8221; code. There&#8217;s no convincing argument that doesn&#8217;t involve their experience.</p>
<p>At least, I haven&#8217;t found one.</p>
<p>Gil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetShoutout</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/04/25/writing-unit-tests-can-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-15344</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetShoutout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1167#comment-15344</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Writing unit tests can be fun at Mark Needham...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Writing unit tests can be fun at Mark Needham&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this cool story &#8211; Trackback from DotNetShoutout&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

