<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pair Programming: Refactoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Pair Programming: Refactoring at Mark Needham [markhneedham.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/comment-page-1/#comment-21809</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Pair Programming: Refactoring at Mark Needham [markhneedham.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1255#comment-21809</guid>
		<description>[...] Pair Programming: Refactoring at Mark Needham  www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Thoughts on Software Development &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pair Programming: Refactoring at Mark Needham  <a href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring" rel="nofollow">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Thoughts on Software Development &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/comment-page-1/#comment-17809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1255#comment-17809</guid>
		<description>@Makk384 - I&#039;ve actually not worked on a team that does code reviews nope.

You&#039;re right about prototyping being a time when pair programming might not add a great deal of value although I think it depends what stage in the prototyping that we&#039;re at. I wrote a bit more about when to pair -&gt; http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/10/09/pair-programming-why-would-i-pair-on-this/

Haven&#039;t seen prototyping potential refactorings before though, sounds like an interesting idea to try out, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Makk384 &#8211; I've actually not worked on a team that does code reviews nope.</p>
<p>You're right about prototyping being a time when pair programming might not add a great deal of value although I think it depends what stage in the prototyping that we're at. I wrote a bit more about when to pair -> <a href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/10/09/pair-programming-why-would-i-pair-on-this/" rel="nofollow">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2008/10/09/pair-programming-why-would-i-pair-on-this/</a></p>
<p>Haven't seen prototyping potential refactorings before though, sounds like an interesting idea to try out, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makk384</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/comment-page-1/#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator>Makk384</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1255#comment-17804</guid>
		<description>A much easier approach, and one that I find requires fewer resources, is for someone to do a prototype change, and present it to the team. Generally less disagreement about whether the approach will work, and less of a feeling from other team members that the pair doing the prototype work are conspiring against them. 

Assuming a process is in-place to do a code review (you do do code reviews, right?), then this approach is less bogged down than typical pair programming exercises. Mind you, I do believe pair programming has it&#039;s place, usually in finding solutions to seemingly intractable problems, but general prototyping should not be one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A much easier approach, and one that I find requires fewer resources, is for someone to do a prototype change, and present it to the team. Generally less disagreement about whether the approach will work, and less of a feeling from other team members that the pair doing the prototype work are conspiring against them. </p>
<p>Assuming a process is in-place to do a code review (you do do code reviews, right?), then this approach is less bogged down than typical pair programming exercises. Mind you, I do believe pair programming has it's place, usually in finding solutions to seemingly intractable problems, but general prototyping should not be one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop - May 27, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/comment-page-1/#comment-17725</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop - May 27, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1255#comment-17725</guid>
		<description>[...] Pair Programming: Refactoring (Mark Needham) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pair Programming: Refactoring (Mark Needham) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Reasons to Pair @ Agile Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/comment-page-1/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>More Reasons to Pair @ Agile Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1255#comment-17722</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/" rel="nofollow">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/26/pair-programming-refactoring/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
