Comments on: Coding Dojo #16: Reading SUnit code http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/29/coding-dojo-16-reading-sunit-code/ Thoughts on Software Development Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:46:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Mark Needham http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/29/coding-dojo-16-reading-sunit-code/comment-page-1/#comment-17864 Mark Needham Sat, 30 May 2009 01:56:22 +0000 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-17864 I think I follow the explanation of how it would work in Smalltalk although I've forgotten exactly how it would read if we did a C# comparison. Which call would the FailureException be catching an exception of? I think I follow the explanation of how it would work in Smalltalk although I've forgotten exactly how it would read if we did a C# comparison.

Which call would the FailureException be catching an exception of?

]]> By: DCam http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/05/29/coding-dojo-16-reading-sunit-code/comment-page-1/#comment-17832 DCam Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:48 +0000 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-17832 The FailureException catch block is actually nested inside the ErrorException catch block. It's because of the "]]" on the first sunitExitWith: false line. From a SmallTalk point of view, the first sunitOn: message is sent to the [aTestCase runCase. true] block, and the second sunitOn: message is sent to the block which includes the first sunitOn: call. I wish VisualWorks would have laid it out to make that obvious, but I don't think it paid attention to the []s. I am making any sense? The FailureException catch block is actually nested inside the ErrorException catch block. It's because of the "]]" on the first sunitExitWith: false line.

From a SmallTalk point of view, the first sunitOn: message is sent to the [aTestCase runCase. true] block, and the second sunitOn: message is sent to the block which includes the first sunitOn: call. I wish VisualWorks would have laid it out to make that obvious, but I don't think it paid attention to the []s.

I am making any sense?

]]>