<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Lazy and Bad Lazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehong choi</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-22114</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehong choi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-22114</guid>
		<description>Right.
I think good lazy is thoughtful, but it appears lazy. Bad lazy sounds like neglect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.<br />
I think good lazy is thoughtful, but it appears lazy. Bad lazy sounds like neglect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenQuality.ru &#124; Июльская лента: лучшее за месяц</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20757</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenQuality.ru &#124; Июльская лента: лучшее за месяц</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20757</guid>
		<description>[...] сопротивления в разработке ПО: в каких случаях лень может принести пользу и в каких активировать мины [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] сопротивления в разработке ПО: в каких случаях лень может принести пользу и в каких активировать мины [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Quality Digest - 2009-07-27 &#124; No bug left behind</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20560</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Quality Digest - 2009-07-27 &#124; No bug left behind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20560</guid>
		<description>[...] Good Lazy and Bad Lazy - &#8220;Something which I&#8217;ve come to realise more recently is that it&#8217;s not necessarily true that being lazy as a developer is always a good thing - it depends in what way you are being lazy because there are certainly good and bad ways in which you can express your laziness!&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good Lazy and Bad Lazy &#8211; &#8220;Something which I&#8217;ve come to realise more recently is that it&#8217;s not necessarily true that being lazy as a developer is always a good thing &#8211; it depends in what way you are being lazy because there are certainly good and bad ways in which you can express your laziness!&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by chirantan</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20450</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by chirantan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20450</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by chirantan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by chirantan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #395</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #395</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>[...] Good Lazy and Bad Lazy - Mark Needham talks about Developer laziness and how it can be both a good thing and a bad thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good Lazy and Bad Lazy &#8211; Mark Needham talks about Developer laziness and how it can be both a good thing and a bad thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hisham MK</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20402</link>
		<dc:creator>Hisham MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20402</guid>
		<description>Good lazy programmers are person who are lazy to do a lot of work but not lazy to think a lot. They will use their mind to think on how to achieve a lot of results with minimal effort, in the end, they will find the straightest way to the destination (the shortest path is the straightest path, also the most correct &amp; efficient path).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lazy programmers are person who are lazy to do a lot of work but not lazy to think a lot. They will use their mind to think on how to achieve a lot of results with minimal effort, in the end, they will find the straightest way to the destination (the shortest path is the straightest path, also the most correct &amp; efficient path).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Serafino</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Serafino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20385</guid>
		<description>The bad lazy programmer ends up doing more work every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad lazy programmer ends up doing more work every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gillard-Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/07/21/good-lazy-and-bad-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-20381</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gillard-Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1476#comment-20381</guid>
		<description>Very true.  I think it&#039;s all about deferred gratification: do I want to do less work today or less work tomorrow.  The lazy programmers Philipp Lensson refers to are those who would rather work hard today to rest tomorrow.  The bad lazy programmers take the risk or being lazy today hoping it won&#039;t come to bite them in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true.  I think it&#8217;s all about deferred gratification: do I want to do less work today or less work tomorrow.  The lazy programmers Philipp Lensson refers to are those who would rather work hard today to rest tomorrow.  The bad lazy programmers take the risk or being lazy today hoping it won&#8217;t come to bite them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

