http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/15/builders-hanging-off-class-vs-builders-in-same-namespace/ Thoughts on Software Development Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:49:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/15/builders-hanging-off-class-vs-builders-in-same-namespace/comment-page-1/#comment-30046 C# Object Initializer: More thoughts at Mark Needham Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:17:50 +0000 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1538#comment-30046 [...] get the second version to work which my colleague Lu Ning pointed out to me when we were discussing how to use the builder pattern on a project we worked on [...] [...] get the second version to work which my colleague Lu Ning pointed out to me when we were discussing how to use the builder pattern on a project we worked on [...]

]]> http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/15/builders-hanging-off-class-vs-builders-in-same-namespace/comment-page-1/#comment-21556 Mark Needham Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:13:20 +0000 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1538#comment-21556 Oooh neat I didn't think of that approach, good thinkin'! Oooh neat I didn't think of that approach, good thinkin'!

]]> http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/15/builders-hanging-off-class-vs-builders-in-same-namespace/comment-page-1/#comment-21541 Jonathan Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:15:11 +0000 http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1538#comment-21541 So you want the IDE help of Builders. and the initializer? How about just doing x = new Builders. - and get the best of both worlds? So you want the IDE help of Builders. and the initializer? How about just doing x = new Builders. – and get the best of both worlds?

]]>