<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding: Group the duplication, then remove it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Coding: Copy/Paste then refactor at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25909</link>
		<dc:creator>Coding: Copy/Paste then refactor at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1591#comment-25909</guid>
		<description>[...] neat thing about this approach is that it made it much easier to see where the duplication was and I was able to have both the functions working before trying to do that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] neat thing about this approach is that it made it much easier to see where the duplication was and I was able to have both the functions working before trying to do that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDD: Test the behaviour rather than implementation at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-22113</link>
		<dc:creator>TDD: Test the behaviour rather than implementation at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1591#comment-22113</guid>
		<description>[...] previously wrote about some duplicated code we&#039;d taken the time to remove from our code base and one something else that we found when working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously wrote about some duplicated code we'd taken the time to remove from our code base and one something else that we found when working [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coding: Group the duplication, then remove it at Mark Needham &#124; Cd duplication live today</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-21876</link>
		<dc:creator>Coding: Group the duplication, then remove it at Mark Needham &#124; Cd duplication live today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1591#comment-21876</guid>
		<description>[...] prototypal assemble every the cipher into digit locate &#8230;     Go here to wager the original:  Coding: Group the duplication, then vanish it at Mark Needham     Posted in Software, Uncategorized &#124; Tags: code-into, first-group, for-doing, from-code, more, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prototypal assemble every the cipher into digit locate &#8230;     Go here to wager the original:  Coding: Group the duplication, then vanish it at Mark Needham     Posted in Software, Uncategorized | Tags: code-into, first-group, for-doing, from-code, more, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coding: The guilty bystander at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/08/30/coding-group-the-duplication-then-remove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-21870</link>
		<dc:creator>Coding: The guilty bystander at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1591#comment-21870</guid>
		<description>[...] discussing the duplication in our code based which I described in an earlier post with some other colleagues earlier this week I realised that I had actually gone past this code a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussing the duplication in our code based which I described in an earlier post with some other colleagues earlier this week I realised that I had actually gone past this code a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
