<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding: Watch out for mutable code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/09/16/coding-watch-out-for-mutable-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/09/16/coding-watch-out-for-mutable-code/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rinat Abdullin</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/09/16/coding-watch-out-for-mutable-code/comment-page-1/#comment-22705</link>
		<dc:creator>Rinat Abdullin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1646#comment-22705</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

It&#039;s nice to hear that people at ThoughtWorks are coming forward to good development principles out there.

BTW, here&#039;s the approach I use on a regular bases in order to keep Immutable classes really immutable in unit tests.

Best Regards,
Rinat Abdullin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>It's nice to hear that people at ThoughtWorks are coming forward to good development principles out there.</p>
<p>BTW, here's the approach I use on a regular bases in order to keep Immutable classes really immutable in unit tests.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Rinat Abdullin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/09/16/coding-watch-out-for-mutable-code/comment-page-1/#comment-22679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1646#comment-22679</guid>
		<description>You make a good point about test cases around get set values. I also usually search down those hidden away code by using reSharper&#039;s &quot;Find Usages&quot;. It just gives you more confidence on what the total impact will be.

Of course, your point of having unit tests is the best solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point about test cases around get set values. I also usually search down those hidden away code by using reSharper's "Find Usages". It just gives you more confidence on what the total impact will be.</p>
<p>Of course, your point of having unit tests is the best solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Coding: Watch out for mutable code at Mark Needham -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/09/16/coding-watch-out-for-mutable-code/comment-page-1/#comment-22637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Coding: Watch out for mutable code at Mark Needham -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1646#comment-22637</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by planettw and David Santoro. David Santoro said: Really Interesting concept! RT: @markhneedham: be careful around mutable code - http://bit.ly/3iSnQh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by planettw and David Santoro. David Santoro said: Really Interesting concept! RT: @markhneedham: be careful around mutable code &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/3iSnQh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3iSnQh</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
