<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consistency in the code base</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/11/04/consistency-in-the-code-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/11/04/consistency-in-the-code-base/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consistency in the code base and incremental refactoring at Mark Needham</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/11/04/consistency-in-the-code-base/comment-page-1/#comment-36172</link>
		<dc:creator>Consistency in the code base and incremental refactoring at Mark Needham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-36172</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a post a while ago about keeping consistency in the code base where I covered some of the reasons that you might want to rewrite parts of a code base and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a post a while ago about keeping consistency in the code base where I covered some of the reasons that you might want to rewrite parts of a code base and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developer Art</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2009/11/04/consistency-in-the-code-base/comment-page-1/#comment-26193</link>
		<dc:creator>Developer Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-26193</guid>
		<description>The difficulties in common acceptance of the code standards come when you attempt to standardize something that is beyond common sense and clear advantages but more of a personal preference where multiple options are possible with none having objective benefits over the others.

Let the people have their own preferences and only make rules for something that absolutely needs to be done consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difficulties in common acceptance of the code standards come when you attempt to standardize something that is beyond common sense and clear advantages but more of a personal preference where multiple options are possible with none having objective benefits over the others.</p>
<p>Let the people have their own preferences and only make rules for something that absolutely needs to be done consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

