<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Javascript: Some stuff I learnt this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2010/02/12/javascript-some-stuff-i-learnt-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2010/02/12/javascript-some-stuff-i-learnt-this-week/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2010/02/12/javascript-some-stuff-i-learnt-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-65371</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=2145#comment-65371</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s weird how difficult its been to test and debug our Javascript. I think we might be doing it wrong. We should have functions that do things to the DOM, functions that tell us about the DOM, but not both at the same time.&quot;

I&#039;m dealing with that very same issue right now! It&#039;s a relatively small project, but I haven&#039;t separated my code well enough, and debugging has been proving to be difficult...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s weird how difficult its been to test and debug our Javascript. I think we might be doing it wrong. We should have functions that do things to the DOM, functions that tell us about the DOM, but not both at the same time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m dealing with that very same issue right now! It&#8217;s a relatively small project, but I haven&#8217;t separated my code well enough, and debugging has been proving to be difficult&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cucudas</title>
		<link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2010/02/12/javascript-some-stuff-i-learnt-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-33151</link>
		<dc:creator>cucudas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/?p=2145#comment-33151</guid>
		<description>I find it quite intriguing how difficult we&#039;ve sometimes found it to unit test Javascript on some of the projects I&#039;ve worked on without ending up with really complicated tests and it seems to me that perhaps the biggest reason for this is that we&#039;re often writing functions which violate the idea of command query separation principle.
I have some trouble to understand above long statement.
Please divide the statement two or more statements.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it quite intriguing how difficult we&#8217;ve sometimes found it to unit test Javascript on some of the projects I&#8217;ve worked on without ending up with really complicated tests and it seems to me that perhaps the biggest reason for this is that we&#8217;re often writing functions which violate the idea of command query separation principle.<br />
I have some trouble to understand above long statement.<br />
Please divide the statement two or more statements.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

